Tracking integration¶
There are several ways to integrate event reporting into the webpage. The simplest way is to generate code of a tiny image and put it on the webpage where the event must be sent pixel tracking.
For example, with HTML:
1 |
|
or with JavaScript:
1 2 3 4 |
|
The drawback of this option is that such calls can be blocked by ad blockers or do-not-track plugins on the client side.
Server-side tracking¶
Another option is to call the tracker from the server. The most important drawback is that the event request increases the general request time. If the network is overloaded or the Personalization server is not available, the number of requests can grow and lead to a stalled and finally crashing HTTP service. See below the techniques that help avoid these problems.
Tracking at the bottom¶
You can place the code at the very end of the generating script and flush the output buffer to the client before sending the events. The connection to the browser can remain open for the time of processing, but it is transparent for the end user.
Tracking asynchronously¶
If the website is implemented in a language that supports multithreading, non-blocking I/O or messaging infrastructure, you can start the event request right after the browser request is received instead of waiting for this process to finish.
Client-side tracking¶
Using JSONP¶
Another solution is to provide a proxy on the server side, which forwards script requests to the Personalization server. In this model, the requests are triggered from the client, when the page is already loaded and rendered. It is impossible to request the recommendation controller server directly from JavaScript (either through the AJAX library or directly over XMLHttpRequest) because of the cross-domain restriction in most browsers. One possible work around this limitation is JSONP.
Using server proxy¶
Another option is to tunnel the JavaScript request through the proxy on the same server. The server only forwards requests to the Personalization server. It can be an implemented Apache proxy module, an independent daemon (for example, "netcat"), or a PHP script.
Comparison¶
An overview of pros and cons for every technique:
Feature | Pixel | Server-side | Page bottom | Async. reporting | JSONP | XMLHttpRequest + Proxy |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Is not blocked by ad blockers or do-not-track plug-ins. | - | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | - | ✔ |
Works if JavaScript is disabled. | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | - | - |
Is compatible with frontend caching on the server. | - | - | - | - | ✔ | ✔ |
Doesn't delay page rendering. | ✔ | - | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ |
Supports authentication for event tracking (not implemented yet). | - | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | - | Yes/No |
The recommended approach
An Ibexa-recommended solution is to use pixel tracking for non-complex events,
or where every page is generated on the server side without any caching logic.
For hints about preloading image URLs with JavaScript elements
(var img = new Image(); img.src="uri"
)
or without them (<img src="uri"... />
), see How to Preload Images.
If you plan to implement caching mechanisms and more complex events like Consume (depending on the viewing time of the page), Basket (which is usually an in-page event) or custom in-page events that take place on the client side, a JavaScript implementation is strongly encouraged. For a sample script and instructions, see Track with ibexa-tracker.js.